| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
1. CCP Blew It! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bootleg Jack wrote: They started out with the best of intentions, to create a create FiS PvP MMO game. And they did accomplish that. But they accidentally also created the best FiS PvE game, even if they were not trying, they somehow got a si...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.19 04:32:00
|
2. Just another disinterested observer with no dog in this fight. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'd like to add my disinterested two cents along with all the other disinterested people who most definitely are not Goons. The Goons apparently had some trouble with High Sec war. That is why they focus on such a feeble, trivial thing as Tears....
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.19 04:29:00
|
3. Millions to attack, Trillions to defend? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
sabre906 wrote: Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: Crunchie Attuxors wrote: Its about the possibilities of the sandbox. Essentially a trillion isk to mount a massive battle ground means banning massive battles in highsec. Where exactly are you ...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.16 23:28:00
|
4. Millions to attack, Trillions to defend? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mortimer Civeri wrote: Jessie-A Tassik wrote: 1.Goons wouldn't last a second in a real sandbox. 2.You are being a ****** by trying to reason with Goons. They know they are lying vermin. They never stop lying. Treating them like they want ...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.16 20:20:00
|
5. An argument against supposed "Goon Tears" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Grumpy Owly wrote: It isnt a well reason argument though. Listing kill stats even when the Goons have larger losses but insiginificant to them neither proves or dissproves anything in terms of the tear saturation levels. You could argue the l...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.16 20:19:00
|
6. EVE 0.0 community opnions on my null sec cloaky. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
strenif wrote: Natsett Amuinn wrote: You should make a few more of these posts. I don't think enough people care yet. I care. AFK cloaking is a bad mechanic. If you are in 0.0 you shouldn't be be able to make yourself permanently safe fro...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.16 20:17:00
|
7. Millions to attack, Trillions to defend? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Crunchie Attuxors wrote: Someone explain to me how that is not a broken mechanic. I don't mean the meta-drama. Goonies gonna goon. Jade is gonna tinfoil. The Mittani gonna be Space Dr. House (yeah, went there). But I expect the company tha...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.16 20:14:00
|
8. War Dec's --- - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Laktos wrote: Pretty much. Goons were sick of getting harassed by constant decs. They are primarily carebears so this is understandable. Yep, you reached down from camping Jita and slaps us in Dek where we were ratting...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.16 20:12:00
|
9. War Dec's --- - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
SetrakDark wrote: I just looked at 5 pages, approximately 3 days, of goon losses on eve kill. The most expensive loss was a 200m recon; the average loss would be around a destroyer or cruiser, and most of the ones I checked died fighting instea...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.16 20:09:00
|
10. War Dec's --- - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cavel Avada wrote: I see this as working as intended. War is an expensive prospect. 10-man corps should not be able to cheaply wardec a corp 10x their size. It's just unrealistic. And bigger armies aren't more expensive. Because. And 5 trib...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.16 20:07:00
|
11. When will Social Consequences be allowed to reach their natural conclusion? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Richard Desturned wrote: Jessie-A Tassik wrote: Lies and lies and lies. It allows you to bail out any important Goon who attacks when he is "merely" outnumbered 10 to 1. A fleet that would take 20 minutes to arrive by gate arrives in 2 min...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.14 22:14:00
|
12. When will Social Consequences be allowed to reach their natural conclusion? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Onyx Nyx wrote: Jessie-A Tassik wrote: Onyx Nyx wrote: Jessie-A Tassik wrote: See? The Goons are now back to the devolved "NPC Alt" nonsense. Ironic that the loudmouthed critics of Goons pretty much do the same. No they don't....
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.14 22:13:00
|
13. When will Social Consequences be allowed to reach their natural conclusion? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Akirei Scytale wrote: Jessie-A Tassik wrote: Lies and more lies. Bridging to a given location is far, far faster than going through gates. Very close to 10 times faster. In certain situations, way more than 10x faster. Like I said, co...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.14 22:11:00
|
14. When will Social Consequences be allowed to reach their natural conclusion? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Richard Desturned wrote: the prevailing belief among npc alts is that we have a standing fleet of 2000 battleships on a titan at all times so that ratters can bail themselves out with a cyno PL bailed out the Titan tard quick enough.
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.14 22:09:00
|
15. When will Social Consequences be allowed to reach their natural conclusion? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Onyx Nyx wrote: Jessie-A Tassik wrote: See? The Goons are now back to the devolved "NPC Alt" nonsense. Ironic that the loudmouthed critics of Goons pretty much do the same. No they don't.
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.14 22:08:00
|
16. When will Social Consequences be allowed to reach their natural conclusion? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Akirei Scytale wrote: Jessie-A Tassik wrote: Again, the lies. Is CYNO Bridging non-capitals somehow not a CYNO blankie? Actually, it is even more a blankie, because the risk is less. Bridges are convenience more than anything. Have y...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.14 22:07:00
|
17. When will Social Consequences be allowed to reach their natural conclusion? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: Jessie-A Tassik wrote: After reading this forum, it has become obvious that Goons need to be beaten and insulted constantly in order for them to make them try to pretend to be human beings. i'm not sure why you think any ...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.14 22:07:00
|
18. When will Social Consequences be allowed to reach their natural conclusion? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Akirei Scytale wrote: Jessie-A Tassik wrote: Alia Gon'die wrote: So you stopped paying your subscription because you thought the game was stupid, then when more stupid changes were introduced you decided to resub to complain about them? ...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.14 22:01:00
|
19. When will Social Consequences be allowed to reach their natural conclusion? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: Jessie-A Tassik wrote: The Goons have enraged most players, and so most players joined into a huge alliance to crush them. Why was this stopped? EDIT: I'm referring to the High Sec War Dec changes. Of course, everyone kn...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.14 22:00:00
|
20. When will Social Consequences be allowed to reach their natural conclusion? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alia Gon'die wrote: So you stopped paying your subscription because you thought the game was stupid, then when more stupid changes were introduced you decided to resub to complain about them? My subscription has yet to run out. And insultin...
- by Jessie-A Tassik - at 2012.06.14 21:59:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |